29 October 2007

Appendices - Self Assessment

1. Theory

I believe that given the research I was able to find, I drew out some factors that lead people to follow religions, and also critically looked at some of the positive and negative thigns. A subject such as this is really quite big, and to fit it all into 1000 to 1500 words would be quite difficult. As such, I only really gave a brief overview. Had I started sorting through my research earlier I believe I would have included more theory in my blog, and therefore would have produced a higher quality essay.

2. Research

I searched many different databases, and retrieved over one hundred articles. As a result of getting so much information I had a LOT of sorting to do and surprisingly at the end of this I was not left with much relevant information to this essay topic. Perhaps I should have searched for different search terms, but most of the information I received was either about respectign religious perspectives in a clinical setting or whether or not religion had benefits to physical or mental health (which was perhaps a little closer to the aim of the essay).

3. Written Expression

Results from the readability analysis follow (retrieved from http://www.ilovejackdaniels.com/readability.php)

Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease: 21
Ideally, web page text should be around the 60 to 80 mark on this scale. The higher the score, the more readable the text.

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 15
Ideally, web page text should be around the 6 to 7 mark on this scale. The lower the score, the more readable the text.

Gunning-Fog Index: 23
Ideally, web page text should be between 11 and 15 on this scale. The lower the score, the more readable the text. (Anything over 22 should be considered the equivalent of post-graduate level text).

It appears that all three of the main analyses indicate that the text is not as readable as it could be. I believe I said this last time but I certainly would like to perform these tests earlier in my writing, so that I could then have more time and flexibility to fix and edit my writing. I believe my use of APA style is good, and the use of headings should hopefully make it a little easier to read the essay. As the results from the readability tests state, my essay could certainly benefit from having better readability scores.

4. Online engagement

Whilst I did not make many online contributions in the earlier stages of my research for this blog, I believe that in the last week or so I have made a fair amount of contributions. From commenting on other students blog postings, to voting on polls I have contributed a fair amount. Also, I put a few posts up (apart from my main blog posting) and included a poll on my blog. The poll attracted quite a few comments, and a fair amount of votes. I could have improved my online engagement by posting a few more entries apart from my main essay posting, and perhaps commenting a little bit more, but overall I was quite satisfied with my online engagement. I really was happy with the response to the following post: http://kayeb.blogspot.com/2007/10/religious-happier.html

It is quite difficult to track down each of the blogs that I commented on, or all the polls that I voted on. Next time I do a similar exercise I should make a note of the URL of each blog post I comment on.

What proportion of people ascribe to a religion? Why?

Abstract

This essay was posted in blog format, and examines the proportion of people who ascribe to religion, and some of the possible reasons that people follow religion, as well as some of the benefits and drawbacks.


Introduction

Emmons and Paloutzian (2003, p. 386) have defined religiousness as “a person characteristic, as a belief and meaning system that is stable over time and manifested across diverse situations”. Emmons and Paloutzian further suggest that gratitude, forgiveness and humility may be some of the factors that cause religion to have a beneficial effect on health. This essay aims to determine what proportion of people ascribe to a religion, and some of the possible reasons that people may follow a religion.


Proportion

Sources that detail the proportion of people ascribing to a different religion can vary dramatically, given that the definition of religion may be variable. Short of asking every person in the world what religion they ascribe to, a definite answer cannot be obtained. It should be noted that even if every person in the world was asked, some people may simply state that they are religious or non-religious because of social pressures, rather than reporting what they personally believe. This fits in with the social psychological concept of public compliance, where a person publicly states one opinion, but privately believes something else. Even so, some figures have been obtained (Wikipedia, 2007) and the three most populous religions are Christianity (approximately 2.1 billion), Islam (approximately 1.5 billion) and Hindiusm (approximately 900 million). A hyperlink to this figure has been inserted into a blog posting for reference.


Personality

Maltby (1999) states that religious orientation is related to personality. The author found that all aspects of religiosity, such as intrinsic orientation toward religion and frequency of prayer, were negatively related to psychoticism. There was no association found between religiosity and other personality variables. Obsessional personality traits were found to be positively related to personal religion. This evidence does not seem to support the idea that certain personality traits lead people to be more or less likely to follow a religion.

Positive mental health

Aalsma and Lapsley (1999) reported that religiosity has been consistently associated with positive mental health outcomes. The authors also noted that it is possible that the relational aspect of being religious provides psychosocial benefits. For example, participation in the religious community can be beneficial to mental health.

Hadaway (1978) provided support for the idea that religion is a coping resource, and it was found to help Americans lead happier lives. Hintikka (2001) found a positive relationship between religious attendance and life satisfaction. Apparently social support did not seem to affect this relationship. Because the Finns are racially and religiously homogenous this study is very representative of that population, however whether it can be generalised to other populations is less certain.

Young, Cashwell and Shcherbakova (2000) found that spirituality provides a significant moderating effect for negative life events on depression and anxiety, and the effect was found to be stronger for depression. It should be noted that this study only used college students, and most participants reported participating in Christian activities. The authors concede that a more heterogeneous sample would be useful for future research.

Fallot (2001) reported that spirituality can play a positive role for dealing with stress and decision-making. Praying and not using drugs were two reasons given. Involvement in religion also enhances social support. Spirituality also gave many a sense of being a “whole” person, of being complete. Hodges (2000) reported that having an active spiritual life was associated with being emotionally healthy, having meaning and purpose in life. Religion may not always play a positive part, but it often does.


Negative mental health

Fallot (2001) found that depending on the cultural context, sometimes if an individual is hearing voices or displaying other psychiatric symptoms, this may be considered normal. Religion can be helpful or can make things worse, someone in depression may have more severe symptoms as a result of guilt and unattainable ideals. There are also conflicting reports about whether religion is associated with happiness, for example, Lewis (2002) studied Northern Irish undergraduates and found no significant relationship between religiosity and happiness. Further research is needed, into different populations and religions.


Framing

Being religious can change the way a person frames a situation. Gall (2000) claimed that spiritual or religious interpretations of why a person has got cancer can help them frame it more positively, which may enable them to deal with it more effectively. However, it could be possible that a person could learn to frame other situations in a more negative light, which may not lead to such positive outcomes.


Emotional

Thagard (2005) states that religion is full of emotion, and so is cognition. The author cites many different possible reasons that people have religious beliefs, such as traditional arguments about the design of the world and the fact that religion can give an explanation of miracles. The author also mentions desire for comfort, belonging, ethics and immortality. Thagard suggests that religion can provide satisfaction of cognitive and emotional needs. Children acquire many of their beliefs from their parents and children naturally believe what their parents tell them. The author found no evidence to suggest that religiosity is heritable or that it is due to evolution. However, religion could be a byproduct of something else that did come about through evolution, such as emotional cognition.


Control / social

Meisenhelder (2002) proposed that maybe as individuals are faced with a threat, they want to gain some form of control, even if it is just perceived control. If an individual feels that they cannot control an event, they may look to a higher power, such as a god. This may give the individual a sense of control and reassurance. The author also states that religious services bring people together in a supportive social environment.


Stone, Cross, Purvis and Young (2003) found that religious beliefs and participation, such as praying, were found to be very helpful for coping with stress. Relationships with others in the church community also helped.


Need for answers

Pataki (2006) notes that many people are drawn to religion because they believe it is ‘good’, and provides them with hope. Religion has the capacity to provide answers to questions such as why there bad things happen. Humans have a need to ‘know’ and religion provides answers to many of the questions.

Shobris (1994) explains that the universality of religion may suggest a common biological tendency. There may be a religion specific part of the brain located in the temporal lobes, involving the limbic system.


Conclusion

There are many different reasons that a person may ascribe to a religion, though one of the largest influences would be the environment that a person was brought up in. Religion is impressed upon children from a very early age, and children would not generally question what their parents tell them, and this can dramaticaly shape their view of the world. Religion can provide some benefits, to both physical and mental health, and the main reasons for this appear to be due to the social contact that religious involvement often brings.

References

Aalsma, M. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1999). Religiosity and adolescent narcissism: Implications for values counseling [Electronic version]. Counseling & Values, 44(1), 17-29.

Emmons, R. A., & Paloutzian, R. F. (2003). The psychology of religion [Electronic version]. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377-402.

Fallot, R. D. (2001). Spirituality and religion in psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery from mental illness [Electronic version]. International Review of Psychiatry, 13, 110-116.

Gall, T. L. (2000). Integrating religious resources within a general model of stress and coping: Long-term adjustment to breast cancer [Electronic version]. Journal of Religion and Health, 39(2), 167-182.

Hadaway, C. K. (1978). Life satisfaction and religion: A reanalysis [Electronic version]. Social Forces, 57(2), 636-643.

Hintikka, J. (2001). Religious attendance and life satisfaction in the Finnish general population [Electronic version]. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 29(2), 158-164.

Hodges, S. (2002). Mental health, depression, and dimensions of spirituality and religion [Electronic version]. Journal of Adult Development, 9(2), 109-115.

Lewis, C. A. (2002). Church attendance and happiness among northern Irish undergraduate students: No association [Electronic version]. Pastoral Psychology, 50(3), 191-195.

Maltby, J. (1999). Personality dimensions of religious orientation [Electronic version]. The Journal of Psychology, 133(6), 631-640.

Meisenhelder, J. B. (2002). Terrorism, posttraumatic stress, and religious coping [Electronic version]. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 23, 771-782.

Pataki, T. (2006). Against religion [Electronic version]. Australian Book Review, February 2006, 36-41.

Shobris, J. G. (1994). The dualism of psychology [Electronic version]. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 120(4), 373-393.

Stone, H. W., Cross, D. R., Purvis, K. B., & Young, M. J. (2003). A study of the benefit of social and religious support on church members during times of crisis [Electronic version]. Pastoral Psychology, 51(4), 327-340.

Thagard, P. (2005). The emotional coherence of religion [Electronic version]. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 58-74.

Wikipedia. (2007). Religion. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion October 21, 2007.

Young, J. S., Cashwell, C. S., & Shcherbakova, J. (2000). The moderating relationship of spirituality on negative life events and psychological adjustment [Electronic version]. Counseling & Values, 45(1), 49-57.


Please click here to visit the appendices (self-assessment) for this blog post

28 October 2007

thanks to all those who left comments about my last post!

hi all

first i'd like to thank all you guys who commented on my last post, each answer was great and gave me a different perspective on the whole issue.

now back to business: i am posting a link to wikipedia (i know i know but from what i've seen it actually does have accurate information a lot of the time!), a pie chart of the make up of different religions worldwide. of course, even if this was not from wikipedia it should be considered with some caution...i'm not sure of any way to get a 100% accurate count of who prescribes to which religions. in fact, another though i just had is that many people may feel forced to indicate they belong to a particular religion, when in fact they privately do not believe the religion. this would seem to be the social psychological effect of public compliance i think...where you publicly believe something but privately don't believe it. anyway here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Worldwide_percentage_of_Adherents_by_Religion.png

27 October 2007

religious = happier?

so far in my research i have found a common theme - those with religious affiliation tend to be happier, and a large part of this is from active involvement in the religious community (whether church or other). this is not a definite fact, however, but i have so far found quite a bit of evidence to suggest this may be the case.

it makes me wonder though, can you be as happy if you are not religious? as far as i know, there is no equivalent to church for the nonreligious...except perhaps being a member of other socities (such as the UC psych society perhaps?)

any thoughts would be welcome!

brett k

22 October 2007

new blog topic: religion

it's probably about time i get my blog started on religion. i have found MANY articles on various aspects of religion, but from what i've seen so far it is not terribly useful/relevant to my blog. the question i need to answer is:

What proportion of people ascribe to a religion? Why? Explore from a social psychological perspective.

so i am thinking of getting some statistics of how many people belong to which religion...i am unaware of any really good source for this information, and i expect that any figures obtained will largely be estimated but if anyone has any other ideas on how to get this information that would be much appreciated.

as i get through the research that i have i will post more...until then...